Skip to main content

Prud’hommes exhibit list

Build a useful exhibit schedule for a French labour-court case

A `bordereau de pièces` for the French labour court (`conseil de prud’hommes`) is a numbered list of documents exchanged with the other party in support of stated claims. Give each item a neutral label, then link it to the fact or claim category it supports. Flag duplicates, unreadable items and missing proof while preserving originals and a record of when and how each exhibit was sent. This builder organizes evidence; it does not decide admissibility, merits, damages, limitation periods or claims.

Jurisdiction: France · French law

Checked 30 August 2026 · official French and EU sourcesAlphaDeep legal editorial team
EXTRACTABLE WORKSHEET

Evidence bundle

Each divider links a claim, an exhibit and a point that remains to be proved.

  1. 01What is a prud'hommes exhibit schedule for?

    It inventories and numbers documents exchanged with the other party so the evidence file can be checked.

    Service-Public CPH filing
  2. 02How should an exhibit be labelled neutrally?

    Describe its type, date and subject without arguing the case in the title.

    case conduct
  3. 03In what order should exhibits be numbered?

    Choose a stable logic—often chronological or by claim—and document it.

    representation
  4. 04How can a claim category be mapped to evidence?

    Each stated category should point to identifiable facts and exhibits or to a gap.

    Service-Public — dépôt Cerfa 15586
  5. 05How can duplicates or incomplete versions be found?

    Compare date, author, page count and version while preserving originals.

    Service-Public — annexe bordereau de pièces
  6. 06Should every held document be included?

    Relevance and communication require procedural judgment; this tool does not select for you.

    Service-Public CPH filing

Classify the next question—without entering case facts

Choose a category only. No date, amount, name, identifier, document or free text is sent to analytics.

Which point should be verified first?
NUMBERING_READY

What is a prud'hommes exhibit schedule for?

It inventories and numbers documents exchanged with the other party so the evidence file can be checked.

Verify this route against the cited official source and the complete document.

Server-rendered worked resultWhat is a prud'hommes exhibit schedule for?. It inventories and numbers documents exchanged with the other party so the evidence file can be checked. This categorical output is a route to verify, not legal advice, a deadline or an outcome prediction.
  • NUMBERING_READY · It inventories and numbers documents exchanged with the other party so the evidence file can be checked.
  • DUPLICATE_CHECK · Describe its type, date and subject without arguing the case in the title.
  • CLAIM_EVIDENCE_GAPS · Choose a stable logic—often chronological or by claim—and document it.
  • PROFESSIONAL_REVIEW · Each stated category should point to identifiable facts and exhibits or to a gap.

What is a prud'hommes exhibit schedule for?

It inventories and numbers documents exchanged with the other party so the evidence file can be checked. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

How should an exhibit be labelled neutrally?

Describe its type, date and subject without arguing the case in the title. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

In what order should exhibits be numbered?

Choose a stable logic—often chronological or by claim—and document it. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

How can a claim category be mapped to evidence?

Each stated category should point to identifiable facts and exhibits or to a gap. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

How can duplicates or incomplete versions be found?

Compare date, author, page count and version while preserving originals. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

Should every held document be included?

Relevance and communication require procedural judgment; this tool does not select for you. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

How should proof of communication be kept?

Keep the dated schedule and a record of when and how each exhibit was sent, including acknowledgements and versions. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

When should the schedule be reviewed?

Seek review before filing or communication when claims, timing or evidence are disputed. Read the complete current document and preserve the underlying evidence before applying this point to a case.

Official sources

Move from the public checklist to a sourced review

Julie keeps the prepared question through signup and opens it in chat. Do not include sensitive data in the public tool.

Prepare my exhibit schedule with Julie

Related reading

Compare French legal AI assistantsDisputed SEPA direct debit in France: mandate and evidenceForeign employer hiring an employee in France

General information about French law, checked on the date shown. This page does not replace professional review of the complete document, applicable time limits and your circumstances. Do not enter sensitive data in the on-page tool.