Education and qualifications · France and Switzerland : separate country-labelled rules
Granted school support missing: document delivery
A granted school-support decision and its actual implementation are separate questions. This file concerns support already awarded but missing in practice, rather than a new challenge to eligibility. France and Swiss cantons use different responsible bodies. Compare the decision, specified measures, actual assistance and previous replies without promising a staffing outcome or importing one country's assessment process.
- Official texts cited
- Sources checked on
- Drafted with AI assistance, our method
General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.
Julie by AlphaDeep
What does the French notice actually provide?
L351-3 distinguishes individual and pooled support. Do not invent fixed pooled-support hours absent from the decision.
Read the referencesYour question concerns “Granted school support missing: document delivery”. I can help organise the facts and records. Which document have you received or prepared, and is this a French or Swiss matter?
3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.
Which school support has already been granted?
Keep the existing decision and period. This concerns implementation, not a new disability-entitlement application.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
What does the French notice actually provide?
L351-3 distinguishes individual and pooled support. Do not invent fixed pooled-support hours absent from the decision.
Which records are still missing from your file?
Indicate which records you have. The result identifies gaps and prepares a complete question for Julie, without requiring an account.
Fictional example · Your preparation
Point to complete: Dated gaps and requests. Use a period-by-period table of promised provision, observed provision and evidence. Unknown facts must remain unknown.
- Support already granted
- Record available
- Terms of the decision
- Record available
- Support actually supplied
- Record available
- Dated gaps and requests
- Needs checking
- Records indicated
- 3 / 4
- How should the implementation gap be shown?
This worksheet organises records; it does not establish admissibility, entitlement or a procedural outcome.
What support was actually supplied?
Compare dates, timetable and observed provision. Separate a missing assistant from a different organisational or teaching problem.
Which documents answer which questions?
| Record or information | Issue to check |
|---|---|
| Support already granted | Keep the existing decision and period. This concerns implementation, not a new disability-entitlement application. |
| Terms of the decision | L351-3 distinguishes individual and pooled support. Do not invent fixed pooled-support hours absent from the decision. |
| Support actually supplied | Compare dates, timetable and observed provision. Separate a missing assistant from a different organisational or teaching problem. |
| Dated gaps and requests | Use a period-by-period table of promised provision, observed provision and evidence. Unknown facts must remain unknown. |
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
How should the implementation gap be shown?
Use a period-by-period table of promised provision, observed provision and evidence. Unknown facts must remain unknown.
What Swiss framework is relevant separately?
LHand 20 concerns appropriate cantonal basic education; LHand 8 has defined inequality-remedy branches. Neither creates a French AESH or CDAPH system.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
Which prior implementation requests matter?
Keep dated requests and responses from the school or authority. The worksheet does not reopen the already-granted entitlement.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
Which official provision helps explain this situation?
Lorsque la commission mentionnée à l'article L. 146-9 du code de l'action sociale et des familles constate que la scolarisation d'un enfant dans une classe de l'enseignement public ou d'un établissement mentionné à l'article L. 442-1 du présent code requiert une aide individuelle dont elle détermine la quotité horaire, cette aide peut notamment être apportée par un accompagnant des élèves en situation de handicap recruté conformément aux modalités définies à l'article L. 917-1.
In plain English: LHand 20 concerns appropriate cantonal basic education; LHand 8 has defined inequality-remedy branches. Neither creates a French AESH or CDAPH system.
Does non-delivery automatically establish damages?
No. Route, legal conditions, harm and causation need separate assessment. A count of missing periods does not calculate compensation.
What does the support tracker deliver?
It compares the actual decision and delivery with dated records. It changes no entitlement and guarantees no court measure.
What other questions arise in this file?
What does the French notice actually provide?
L351-3 distinguishes individual and pooled support. Do not invent fixed pooled-support hours absent from the decision.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
How should the implementation gap be shown?
Use a period-by-period table of promised provision, observed provision and evidence. Unknown facts must remain unknown.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
What Swiss framework is relevant separately?
LHand 20 concerns appropriate cantonal basic education; LHand 8 has defined inequality-remedy branches. Neither creates a French AESH or CDAPH system.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
Does non-delivery automatically establish damages?
No. Route, legal conditions, harm and causation need separate assessment. A count of missing periods does not calculate compensation.
Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Code de l’éducation art. L351-3151.3 : Art. 20151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestations
Which official references should you consult?
- Code de l’éducation art. L112-1Légifrance
- Code de l’éducation art. L351-3Légifrance
- 151.3 : Art. 20Fedlex
- 151.3 : Art. 8 Droits subjectifs en matière de prestationsFedlex
Texts cited last checked: 1 November 2026