Public assets: occupation, use and management · France / Switzerland
Economic public-land allocation: selection dossier
An initial economic-occupation award needs a defined opportunity and the actual legal basis for publicity or selection. France’s public-domain allocation framework differs from Swiss cantonal arrangements and the particular federal rule for transferring public monopolies to private enterprises. Compare notice, duration, criteria, applications and reasons. Do not assume every permit follows one procedure. This dossier concerns initial allocation, separately from public purchasing or review of an existing occupation title.
Julie by AlphaDeep is an AI legal assistant for French law: it researches official references to help answer your questions (Légifrance, case law, service-public), analyses your documents and drafts your letters, for individuals and professionals alike.
- Jurisdiction
- Site and opportunity
- Basis and publicity
- Criteria and applications
- Evaluation and decision
- Official texts cited
- Sources checked on
- Drafted with AI assistance, our method
General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.
Julie by AlphaDeep
Your file concerns “Economic public-land allocation: selection dossier”. Does it concern France or Switzerland? Share the document for site and opportunity and the decision you need to prepare.
3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.
Which economic occupation opportunity and site are allocated?
France: define site, economic use and proposed occupation right. Switzerland: identify the corresponding location and right; this page concerns allocation rather than management of an already issued personal permission.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Opportunity-publicity and allocation-decision register
Synthetic example: fictional records. Opportunity-publicity and allocation-decision register.
Synthetic example: fictional records · Opportunity-publicity and allocation-decision register
- Jurisdiction
- France
- Site and opportunity
- Site S1, activity A1
- Basis and publicity
- Rule R1, notice P1
- Criteria and applications
- Conditions C1, files D1
- Evaluation and decision
- Assessment E1, decision F1
This dossier concerns initial allocation, separately from public purchasing or review of an existing occupation title.
What legal basis requires publicity or selection here?
France: L2122-1-1 contains selection and publicity branches, including adapted cases. Switzerland: BGBM Article 2(7) concerns transfer of cantonal or communal monopoly operation; it is not a universal rule for every economic occupation.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Preparation reference: Opportunity-publicity and allocation-decision register
| Preparation question | Point to verify |
|---|---|
| Which economic occupation opportunity and site are allocated? | France: define site, economic use and proposed occupation right. Switzerland: identify the corresponding location and right; this page concerns allocation rather than management of an already issued personal permission. |
| What legal basis requires publicity or selection here? | France: L2122-1-1 contains selection and publicity branches, including adapted cases. Switzerland: BGBM Article 2(7) concerns transfer of cantonal or communal monopoly operation; it is not a universal rule for every economic occupation. |
| Which exception or spontaneous-interest branch is invoked? | France: connect any exception or unsolicited-interest route to its actual publicity conditions. Switzerland: identify the specific cantonal branch and justification; a French exception cannot establish permission to omit a Swiss procedure. |
| How were duration, conditions and criteria communicated? | France: retain communicated duration, terms and criteria by notice version. Switzerland: preserve the actual publication and conditions likewise; an internal criterion appearing only during evaluation is not proved publicly announced. |
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Which exception or spontaneous-interest branch is invoked?
France: connect any exception or unsolicited-interest route to its actual publicity conditions. Switzerland: identify the specific cantonal branch and justification; a French exception cannot establish permission to omit a Swiss procedure.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
How were duration, conditions and criteria communicated?
France: retain communicated duration, terms and criteria by notice version. Switzerland: preserve the actual publication and conditions likewise; an internal criterion appearing only during evaluation is not proved publicly announced.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
What competing applications and evaluation records exist?
France: retain applications, evidence and dated evaluation records. Switzerland: connect the equivalent records to the applicable procedure; a final score alone does not explain how announced conditions were applied.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Which official provision helps explain this situation?
An initial economic-occupation award needs a defined opportunity and the actual legal basis for publicity or selection. France’s public-domain allocation framework differs from Swiss cantonal arrangements and the particular federal rule for transferring public monopolies to private enterprises. Compare notice, duration, criteria, applications and reasons. Do not assume every permit follows one procedure. This dossier concerns initial allocation, separately from public purchasing or review of an existing occupation title.
Which authority may grant the occupation?
France: establish the authority competent to grant the title. Switzerland: identify canton, commune and concession competence; Geneva’s Grand Council inquiry branch must not be applied indiscriminately to every permission.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
What reasons and documents explain the award?
France: connect decision reasons to criteria and evidence. Switzerland: do the same for the actual local award; the tool neither chooses a winner nor automatically establishes unlawful discrimination from differing outcomes.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Why is allocation different from purchasing services or reviewing an existing title?
France: public occupation and procurement of services address different transactions. Switzerland: likewise distinguish economic rights, procurement and an existing title; a partnership label does not determine the applicable legal procedure.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Which preparation steps come first?
Editorial preparation order, not a popularity or success-probability ranking. Establish opportunity and legal basis before publicity, criteria and traceable allocation reasons.
Define the opportunity
Site, use and proposed right determine the allocation framework to examine.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Justify the procedure
Legal branch, exception and publicity must connect before applications are evaluated.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Retain published criteria
Announced versions provide the reference for comparing the actual assessment.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Trace applications
Evidence and evaluations make different treatment assessable from records.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Connect the decision
Competence and reasons must match the evidence and terms of allocation.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
What other questions arise in this file?
What legal basis requires publicity or selection here?
France: L2122-1-1 contains selection and publicity branches, including adapted cases. Switzerland: BGBM Article 2(7) concerns transfer of cantonal or communal monopoly operation; it is not a universal rule for every economic occupation.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
How were duration, conditions and criteria communicated?
France: retain communicated duration, terms and criteria by notice version. Switzerland: preserve the actual publication and conditions likewise; an internal criterion appearing only during evaluation is not proved publicly announced.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Which authority may grant the occupation?
France: establish the authority competent to grant the title. Switzerland: identify canton, commune and concession competence; Geneva’s Grand Council inquiry branch must not be applied indiscriminately to every permission.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Why is allocation different from purchasing services or reviewing an existing title?
France: public occupation and procurement of services address different transactions. Switzerland: likewise distinguish economic rights, procurement and an existing title; a partnership label does not determine the applicable legal procedure.
Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22
Which official references should you consult?
- Code général de la propriété des personnes publiques : gestion des biens : L2122-1-1, L2122-1-3, L2122-1-4www.legifrance.gouv.fr
- Internal Market Act / BGBM / LMI : 2www.fedlex.admin.ch
- Geneva LDPu L1 05 : 22silgeneve.ch
Texts cited last checked: 3 November 2026