Skip to main content

Data and digital operations · France and Switzerland : separate country-labelled rules

Workplace CCTV: purpose, access and safeguards

Workplace CCTV review compares the stated purpose with actual camera coverage, affected people, retention and access. French and Swiss employment and data-protection rules need separate examination. Document the layout, information and consultation steps rather than assuming a security label settles proportionality. An employee's medical confidentiality and the admissibility of disciplinary evidence raise different questions from the camera installation itself.

4items to document
Go to the toolSee the texts cited
  • Official texts cited
  • Sources checked on
  • Drafted with AI assistance, our method

By the AlphaDeep legal editorial team

General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.

Julie by AlphaDeep

Illustrative conversation
Example question

Which areas and people are captured?

Julie Illustration

Use a plan, angles, times and any audio recording to explain scope. Camera count alone does not establish proportionality.

Read the references

Your question concerns “Workplace CCTV: purpose, access and safeguards”. I can help organise the facts and records. Which document have you received or prepared, and is this a French or Swiss matter?

French law

3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.

Answer

Why is the workplace being filmed?

Record the specific purpose and supporting facts. Entrance security and continuous observation of work are materially different arrangements.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

Tool

Which records are still missing from your file?

Indicate which records you have. The result identifies gaps and prepares a complete question for Julie, without requiring an account.

julie://tool/grilleNothing leaves your browser

Answers stay on this page until you explicitly continue to Julie. Avoid names and sensitive information.

Fictional example · Your preparation

Point to complete: Access and retention. Document permissions, actual access and the chosen retention period. This worksheet supplies no universal lawful duration.

Camera purpose
Record available
Filmed areas and times
Record available
Worker information
Record available
Access and retention
Needs checking
Records indicated
3 / 4
  1. Who can view images and how long are they kept?

This worksheet organises records; it does not establish admissibility, entitlement or a procedural outcome.

Answer

Which areas and people are captured?

Use a plan, angles, times and any audio recording to explain scope. Camera count alone does not establish proportionality.

Answer

What information was provided before collection?

France's Labour Code L1222-4 requires prior employee information for personal-information collection devices. Swiss information and employment-data rules require their own review.

Comparison

Which documents answer which questions?

Which documents answer which questions?
Record or informationIssue to check
Camera purposeRecord the specific purpose and supporting facts. Entrance security and continuous observation of work are materially different arrangements.
Filmed areas and timesUse a plan, angles, times and any audio recording to explain scope. Camera count alone does not establish proportionality.
Worker informationFrance's Labour Code L1222-4 requires prior employee information for personal-information collection devices. Swiss information and employment-data rules require their own review.
Access and retentionDocument permissions, actual access and the chosen retention period. This worksheet supplies no universal lawful duration.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

Answer

Who can view images and how long are they kept?

Document permissions, actual access and the chosen retention period. This worksheet supplies no universal lawful duration.

Answer

What constrains the French employer's restrictions?

L1121-1 requires justification by the task and proportionality to the aim. GDPR minimisation also matters; announcing security does not validate every camera angle.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

Answer

What Swiss employment limits need checking?

CO 328 and328b concern personality and employment-data processing. Swiss surveillance-specific or cantonal rules may add requirements not resolved by these provisions.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

The law

Which official provision helps explain this situation?

Nul ne peut apporter aux droits des personnes et aux libertés individuelles et collectives de restrictions qui ne seraient pas justifiées par la nature de la tâche à accomplir ni proportionnées au but recherché.

Code du travail art. L1121-1In force since 1 May 2008Read on Légifrance

In plain English: L1121-1 requires justification by the task and proportionality to the aim. GDPR minimisation also matters; announcing security does not validate every camera angle.

Answer

How can concerns be recorded without exposing colleagues?

Describe locations and observable use rather than sharing coworkers' images. Separate planned installation, actual operation and unproven suspicion.

Answer

What does the device comparison establish?

It connects purpose, camera scope, information and access records. It is neither an installation permit nor an automatic finding of unlawful monitoring.

Frequent questions

What other questions arise in this file?

Which areas and people are captured?

Use a plan, angles, times and any audio recording to explain scope. Camera count alone does not establish proportionality.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

Who can view images and how long are they kept?

Document permissions, actual access and the chosen retention period. This worksheet supplies no universal lawful duration.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

What constrains the French employer's restrictions?

L1121-1 requires justification by the task and proportionality to the aim. GDPR minimisation also matters; announcing security does not validate every camera angle.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

How can concerns be recorded without exposing colleagues?

Describe locations and observable use rather than sharing coworkers' images. Separate planned installation, actual operation and unproven suspicion.

Code du travail art. L1121-1Code du travail art. L1222-4RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementRGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecte220 : Art. 328220 : Art. 328 b235.1 : Art. 6 Principes235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesCNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travail

Sources

Which official references should you consult?

  1. Code du travail art. L1121-1Légifrance
  2. Code du travail art. L1222-4Légifrance
  3. RGPD, article 5: Principes relatifs au traitementSource officielle
  4. RGPD, article 13: Information lors de la collecteSource officielle
  5. 220 : Art. 328Fedlex
  6. 220 : Art. 328 bFedlex
  7. 235.1 : Art. 6 PrincipesFedlex
  8. 235.1 : Art. 19 Devoir d’informer lors de la collecte de données personnellesFedlex
  9. CNIL : Vidéosurveillance au travailSource officielle

Texts cited last checked: 1 November 2026

Next steps

Which neighbouring situations should remain separate?