Public assets: occupation, use and management · France / Switzerland
Public-road works: conditions and restoration tracker
A roadwork dossier links the physical intervention and footprint to the actual permission. Identify the road manager, other authorities and technical or traffic conditions before assigning each obligation to a responsible party. France and Swiss cantonal procedures require separate examination. The tool tracks supplied dates and completion evidence without inventing a legal deadline. A utility right or access to an existing duct does not itself authorise opening the public road.
Julie by AlphaDeep is an AI legal assistant for French law: it researches official references to help answer your questions (Légifrance, case law, service-public), analyses your documents and drafts your letters, for individuals and professionals alike.
- Jurisdiction
- Permission and version
- Road and footprint
- Supplied observation date
- Official texts cited
- Sources checked on
- Drafted with AI assistance, our method
General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.
Julie by AlphaDeep
What permission or roadwork authorisation covers the work?
France: L113-2 distinguishes permission de voirie and the other occupation branch, with statutory reservations. Switzerland: Geneva Article 56 concerns prior permission or concession; a network agreement alone does not establish roadwork authority.
Read the referencesYour file concerns “Public-road works: conditions and restoration tracker”. Does it concern France or Switzerland? Share the document for road and intervention and the decision you need to prepare.
3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.
Which road, footprint and intervention are concerned?
France: define road, footprint and intervention with plans. Switzerland: identify the actual Geneva road area likewise; trenching, installation and occupation without ground works do not necessarily require the same title.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Individual roadwork-condition and restoration-evidence tracker
Synthetic example: fictional records. Individual roadwork-condition and restoration-evidence tracker.
Synthetic example: fictional records · Individual roadwork-condition and restoration-evidence tracker
- Jurisdiction
- France
- Permission and version
- SYN-A1
- Road and footprint
- SYN-V1 / A
- Supplied observation date
- 2026-11-03
- Supplied conditions
- 2
| Condition | Responsible party | Supplied due date | Supplied completion | Evidence | Recorded status | Difference (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYN-C1 | A | 2026-11-02 | Unknown | Unknown | Supplied date passed; completion unconfirmed | Unknown |
| SYN-C2 | B | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-02 | SYN-P2 | Completion recorded | -1 |
- Partial record: some information remains unknown.
Tracks supplied dates and evidence without inventing a legal deadline or approving restoration.
What permission or roadwork authorisation covers the work?
France: L113-2 distinguishes permission de voirie and the other occupation branch, with statutory reservations. Switzerland: Geneva Article 56 concerns prior permission or concession; a network agreement alone does not establish roadwork authority.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Preparation reference: Individual roadwork-condition and restoration-evidence tracker
| Preparation question | Point to verify |
|---|---|
| Which road, footprint and intervention are concerned? | France: define road, footprint and intervention with plans. Switzerland: identify the actual Geneva road area likewise; trenching, installation and occupation without ground works do not necessarily require the same title. |
| What permission or roadwork authorisation covers the work? | France: L113-2 distinguishes permission de voirie and the other occupation branch, with statutory reservations. Switzerland: Geneva Article 56 concerns prior permission or concession; a network agreement alone does not establish roadwork authority. |
| Which road manager and other authorities must be identified? | France: identify road manager and separate traffic or network services. Switzerland: Geneva Article 57 has its own competence and conditions, reserving separate construction permission; one correspondent does not prove every required act. |
| What technical, traffic and safety conditions were actually imposed? | France: turn technical, circulation and safety conditions into individually referenced rows. Switzerland: reconcile the actual Geneva prescriptions likewise; a general site summary cannot demonstrate fulfilment of every condition in the applicable title. |
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Which road manager and other authorities must be identified?
France: identify road manager and separate traffic or network services. Switzerland: Geneva Article 57 has its own competence and conditions, reserving separate construction permission; one correspondent does not prove every required act.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
What technical, traffic and safety conditions were actually imposed?
France: turn technical, circulation and safety conditions into individually referenced rows. Switzerland: reconcile the actual Geneva prescriptions likewise; a general site summary cannot demonstrate fulfilment of every condition in the applicable title.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Who is responsible for each condition and supplied due date?
France: connect each supplied deadline, responsible actor, completion date and evidence. Switzerland: the same tool comparison uses the entered observation date, not an invented statutory deadline or automatic acceptance of completed work.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Which official provision helps explain this situation?
A roadwork dossier links the physical intervention and footprint to the actual permission. Identify the road manager, other authorities and technical or traffic conditions before assigning each obligation to a responsible party. France and Swiss cantonal procedures require separate examination. The tool tracks supplied dates and completion evidence without inventing a legal deadline. A utility right or access to an existing duct does not itself authorise opening the public road.
What inspections and evidence establish work and restoration?
France: link inspection and restoration evidence to each condition. Switzerland: Article 61 addresses holder duties and restoration; an unsupported completion date remains unconfirmed rather than proving compliant restoration of the entire site.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Which changes or nonconformities must be linked to the permission?
France: retain variations, deviations and manager responses by version. Switzerland: Geneva Article 83 addresses defective or nonconforming work; recording a change does not establish approval or completion of the required corrective action.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Why does a utility or duct-access right not authorise opening the road?
France: network or duct-access rights do not alone authorise opening the road. Switzerland: keep the same distinction under the actual road permission; access entitlement is not proof of every traffic and restoration condition.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Which preparation steps come first?
Editorial preparation order, not a popularity or success-probability ranking. Prioritise conditions enabling work to begin, then execution checks and evidence of restoration.
Define the footprint
Plans and intervention determine the road title and services to identify first.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Connect permission
Actual works must match the applicable title and its documented version.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Separate conditions
Each prescription becomes assessable with its own reference and responsible actor.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Reconcile evidence
Supplied dates and proof distinguish recorded completion from an unsupported statement.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Document restoration
Final checks remain tied to individual conditions rather than assumed overall closure.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Which official references should you consult?
- Code de la voirie routière : L113-2www.legifrance.gouv.fr
- Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83silgeneve.ch
Texts cited last checked: 3 November 2026
What other questions arise in this file?
What permission or roadwork authorisation covers the work?
France: L113-2 distinguishes permission de voirie and the other occupation branch, with statutory reservations. Switzerland: Geneva Article 56 concerns prior permission or concession; a network agreement alone does not establish roadwork authority.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
What technical, traffic and safety conditions were actually imposed?
France: turn technical, circulation and safety conditions into individually referenced rows. Switzerland: reconcile the actual Geneva prescriptions likewise; a general site summary cannot demonstrate fulfilment of every condition in the applicable title.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
What inspections and evidence establish work and restoration?
France: link inspection and restoration evidence to each condition. Switzerland: Article 61 addresses holder duties and restoration; an unsupported completion date remains unconfirmed rather than proving compliant restoration of the entire site.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83
Why does a utility or duct-access right not authorise opening the road?
France: network or duct-access rights do not alone authorise opening the road. Switzerland: keep the same distinction under the actual road permission; access entitlement is not proof of every traffic and restoration condition.
Code de la voirie routière : L113-2Geneva LRoutes L1 10 : 56, 57, 61, 83