Flight training organisation: ATO or DTO file

France: map each licence course and rating course to the organisation’s documented privileges. Switzerland: identify the actual OFAC scope and any limits; teaching a rating to an existing professional pilot is not the same task as providing every professional-licence course.

France: ORA.ATO.105 addresses ATO programmes and manuals, while DTO.GEN.230 requires a programme for each relevant course. Switzerland: use the incorporated scope and actual submission, separating an ordinary programme from any branch requiring specific approval.

France: identify the head of training, instructors and qualifications appropriate to the actual course under the selected route. Switzerland: connect those roles and evidence with the OFAC file; an instructor’s personal licence does not substitute for organisational permission.

France: connect aircraft, relevant devices and operating sites with the courses actually provided. Switzerland: preserve the same course-to-resource map and authority records. An advertised aircraft or location is not proof that it belongs to the permitted scope.

France: link surveillance findings, responses and training records with responsible roles and completion evidence. Switzerland: retain the corresponding authority follow-up and open observations; an internally closed action is not automatically an accepted response or an extended approval.