Collective employment relations · France / Switzerland
Equal pay: prepare the employer analysis
France and Switzerland impose different collective pay-analysis requirements. Define employer scope, period, aggregated data and method before examining results or communication. Swiss analysis and verification rules are not a copy of the French indicator system. This dossier supports the employer’s documented process, separately from an individual discrimination claim, without exposing named employees or certifying equal pay.
Julie by AlphaDeep is an AI legal assistant for French law: it researches official references to help answer your questions (Légifrance, case law, service-public), analyses your documents and drafts your letters, for individuals and professionals alike.
Sources checked2 November 2026
- Official texts cited
- Sources checked on
- Drafted with AI assistance, our method
General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.
Julie by AlphaDeep
France: why use aggregated records in this tool ?
Names and individual salaries are unnecessary for organising the process.
Read the referencesYour question concerns “Equal pay: prepare the employer analysis”. Which document should we examine, and does your matter concern France or Switzerland?
3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.
France: which scope should the pay analysis define ?
Identify employer, period and data-selection criteria.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeur
Which elements belong together before the next step?
| Preparation question | Point to verify |
|---|---|
| France: which scope should the pay analysis define ? | Identify employer, period and data-selection criteria. |
| France: why use aggregated records in this tool ? | Names and individual salaries are unnecessary for organising the process. |
| France: what explains the equal-pay methodology ? | Connect variables, sources and treatment rather than presenting a result alone. |
| France: does performing the analysis prove communication ? | No. Retain actual communication evidence separately. |
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurLEg-fregalite salariale logib
France: why use aggregated records in this tool ?
Names and individual salaries are unnecessary for organising the process.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeur
France: what explains the equal-pay methodology ?
Connect variables, sources and treatment rather than presenting a result alone.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeur
Which official provision helps explain this situation?
Identify employer, period and data-selection criteria.
France: does performing the analysis prove communication ?
No. Retain actual communication evidence separately.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeur
Switzerland: should French indicators be copied ?
No. Identify Swiss analysis and verification requirements for the relevant employer.
Switzerland: which review records should be retained ?
Keep checks, corrections and result versions with traceable changes.
How can you connect the facts and records in your file?
Complete the file references. The initial values illustrate a fictional case; they are not observed product results.
Fictional example · Aggregated pay-analysis and method dossier
- Perimeter
- Company A
- Period
- Identified year
- Data
- Anonymised aggregates
- Method
- Retained documentation
This worksheet organises records; it does not establish admissibility, entitlement or a procedural outcome.
Switzerland: how are follow-up measures documented ?
Connect finding, action, owner and implementation evidence.
Switzerland: does this dossier certify equality or decide discrimination ?
No. It organises the employer’s method and records without such a verdict.
What other questions arise in this file?
France: why use aggregated records in this tool ?
Names and individual salaries are unnecessary for organising the process.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurLEg-fregalite salariale logib
France: does performing the analysis prove communication ?
No. Retain actual communication evidence separately.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurLEg-fregalite salariale logib
Switzerland: which review records should be retained ?
Keep checks, corrections and result versions with traceable changes.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurLEg-fregalite salariale logib
Switzerland: does this dossier certify equality or decide discrimination ?
No. It organises the employer’s method and records without such a verdict.
travail : art. L1142-8Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurLEg-fregalite salariale logib
Which official references should you consult?
- travail : art. L1142-8legifrance.gouv.fr
- Service Public — Égalité salariale : préparer l’analyse de l’employeurentreprendre.service-public.gouv.fr
- LEg-frfedlex.admin.ch
- egalite salariale logibebg.admin.ch
Texts cited last checked: 2 November 2026