Skip to main content

Competition and commercial practices · France / Switzerland

Advertised discount: substantiate the campaign

France and Switzerland apply different price-comparison conditions. Prepare the advertised product, sales channel, comparison type and documented price history. French prior-price requirements should not be imported as a universal Swiss lookback rule. The lowest value entered in a worksheet is only arithmetic; it does not itself establish the legal reference price or validate the advertising.

Julie by AlphaDeep is an AI legal assistant for French law: it researches official references to help answer your questions (Légifrance, case law, service-public), analyses your documents and drafts your letters, for individuals and professionals alike.

6items to document
  • Official texts cited
  • Sources checked on
  • Drafted with AI assistance, our method

General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.

Julie by AlphaDeep

Illustrative conversation
Example question

France: why identify the sales channel ?

Julie Illustration

The history must correspond to the offer examined. Avoid combining incomparable price series.

Read the references

Your question concerns “Advertised discount: substantiate the campaign”. Which document should we examine, and does your matter concern France or Switzerland?

French law

3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.

Answer

France: which discount announcement should be retained ?

Keep wording, medium, product and dates. Distinguish proposed and published advertising.

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixCode de la consommation — L112-1-1conso : art. L112-1-1

Answer

France: why identify the sales channel ?

The history must correspond to the offer examined. Avoid combining incomparable price series.

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixCode de la consommation — L112-1-1conso : art. L112-1-1

Comparison

Which elements belong together before the next step?

Campaign and price-history register
Preparation questionPoint to verify
France: which discount announcement should be retained ?Keep wording, medium, product and dates. Distinguish proposed and published advertising.
France: why identify the sales channel ?The history must correspond to the offer examined. Avoid combining incomparable price series.
France: does the entered minimum establish the legal reference ?No. Applicable period, comparison type and exceptions require separate examination.
France: how are successive discounts distinguished from competitor comparison ?Record the actual mechanism; these comparisons raise different conditions.

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixCode de la consommation — L112-1-1conso : art. L112-1-1OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsOIP — art.17, réductions de prixSECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prix

Answer

No. Applicable period, comparison type and exceptions require separate examination.

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixCode de la consommation — L112-1-1conso : art. L112-1-1

Answer

France: how are successive discounts distinguished from competitor comparison ?

Record the actual mechanism; these comparisons raise different conditions.

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixCode de la consommation — L112-1-1conso : art. L112-1-1

Tool

How can you connect the facts and records in your file?

Complete the file references. The initial values illustrate a fictional case; they are not observed product results.

julie://tool/decompteNothing leaves your browser

Separate columns with | and records with a new line. Date | Unit price

Answers stay on this page until you explicitly continue to Julie. Avoid names and sensitive information.

Fictional example · Campaign and price-history register

Product
Reference A
Channel
Online shop
Campaign
Proposed announcement
History
Documented prices
Register lines
2026-10-01|100 2026-10-15|90
Single currency
EUR
Minimum entered price
90
Campaign and price-history register
DateUnit price
2026-10-01100
2026-10-1590

This worksheet organises records; it does not establish admissibility, entitlement or a procedural outcome.

Answer

Switzerland: should the French lookback rule be copied ?

No. Examine Swiss price-indication and comparison categories on their own terms.

OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsOIP — art.17, réductions de prixSECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prix

The law

Which official provision helps explain this situation?

DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixSources checked 2 November 2026See the texts cited

Keep wording, medium, product and dates. Distinguish proposed and published advertising.

Answer

Switzerland: which history evidence belongs in the dossier ?

Connect dated prices, product and channel. Keep missing records visible.

OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsOIP — art.17, réductions de prixSECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prix

Answer

Switzerland: what supports the published comparison claim ?

Retain the actual announcement and documents for its comparison basis.

OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsOIP — art.17, réductions de prixSECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prix

Answer

Switzerland: what does the campaign calculator determine ?

It identifies the minimum entered price, not the legally valid advertising reference.

OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsOIP — art.17, réductions de prixSECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prix

Frequent questions

What other questions arise in this file?

Sources

Which official references should you consult?

  1. DGCCRF — annonces de réduction de prixeconomie.gouv.fr
  2. Code de la consommation — L112-1-1legifrance.gouv.fr
  3. conso : art. L112-1-1legifrance.gouv.fr
  4. OIP — art.16, indication de prix comparatifsfedlex.admin.ch
  5. OIP — art.17, réductions de prixfedlex.admin.ch
  6. SECO — FAQ relatives à l'indication des prixseco.admin.ch

Texts cited last checked: 2 November 2026