Associations and foundations · France and Switzerland : separate country-labelled rules
Grant clawback: decision, use and supporting evidence
A grant-clawback notice should be compared with the award, agreement, documented spending and stated reason for repayment. French and Swiss funding schemes have their own decisions and review routes. Separate eligibility at award from later compliance and accounting. This file is about public funding already received, not charitable tax receipts or a promise that every repayment demand can be cancelled.
- Official texts cited
- Sources checked on
- Drafted with AI assistance, our method
General legal information with official references and dated checks. It is not personalised advice: for a decision that commits you, have your situation checked by a qualified professional.
Julie by AlphaDeep
Your question concerns “Grant clawback: decision, use and supporting evidence”. I can help organise the facts and records. Which document have you received or prepared, and is this a French or Swiss matter?
3 free questions at signup. Avoid names and sensitive information.
Which records are still missing from your file?
Indicate which records you have. The result identifies gaps and prepares a complete question for Julie, without requiring an account.
Fictional example · Your preparation
Point to complete: Demand and payments. Compare received aid, matched spending and repayments made. The arithmetic difference is not a legally determined recoverable debt.
- Award and agreement
- Record available
- Expenditure and purpose
- Record available
- Review and recovery grounds
- Record available
- Demand and payments
- Needs checking
- Records indicated
- 3 / 4
- Arithmetic result
- 200.00
- What does the amount reconciliation show?
Use one currency and one period. Initial figures are fictional; the result is arithmetic only. The difference decides neither qualifying expenditure nor legally recoverable aid. This worksheet organises records; it does not establish admissibility, entitlement or a procedural outcome.
Which paid grant is being recovered?
Keep award, agreement and received act. This concerns use after payment, not an initial application refusal.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
Which documents answer which questions?
| Record or information | Issue to check |
|---|---|
| Award and agreement | Keep award, agreement and received act. This concerns use after payment, not an initial application refusal. |
| Expenditure and purpose | Match ledger lines and evidence to actual conditions. A real expense is not automatically an accepted qualifying expense. |
| Review and recovery grounds | Law2000-321 article 10 concerns agreement and financial reporting; CRPA L242-2 addresses withdrawal where conditions were not respected within its scope. |
| Demand and payments | Compare received aid, matched spending and repayments made. The arithmetic difference is not a legally determined recoverable debt. |
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
Which costs relate to the funded purpose?
Match ledger lines and evidence to actual conditions. A real expense is not automatically an accepted qualifying expense.
Which French recovery ground is stated?
Law2000-321 article 10 concerns agreement and financial reporting; CRPA L242-2 addresses withdrawal where conditions were not respected within its scope.
Which official provision helps explain this situation?
Lorsque la subvention est affectée à une dépense déterminée, l'organisme de droit privé bénéficiaire doit produire un compte rendu financier qui atteste de la conformité des dépenses effectuées à l'objet de la subvention. Le compte rendu financier est déposé auprès de l'autorité administrative ou de l'organisme chargé de la gestion d'un service public industriel et commercial mentionné au premier alinéa de l'article 9-1 qui a versé la subvention dans les six mois suivant la fin de l'exercice pour lequel elle a été attribuée.
In plain English: Fribourg LSub37-38 distinguishes recovery grounds, warning-related circumstances and specified reliance or hardship branches. It is cantonal law, not federal SR616.1.
What does the amount reconciliation show?
Compare received aid, matched spending and repayments made. The arithmetic difference is not a legally determined recoverable debt.
What Swiss example applies separately?
Fribourg LSub37-38 distinguishes recovery grounds, warning-related circumstances and specified reliance or hardship branches. It is cantonal law, not federal SR616.1.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
Is a payment demand already a final decision?
Identify issuing body, act type and stated procedure. Warning, observations and decision are not interchangeable.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
How should evidence answer the authority's ground?
Connect purpose, period, expense and actual condition. Unrelated project documents do not substantiate the funded activity.
What does the recovery file deliver?
It organises award, use, review and payments. It decides neither withdrawal validity nor entitlement to retain the full grant.
What other questions arise in this file?
Which costs relate to the funded purpose?
Match ledger lines and evidence to actual conditions. A real expense is not automatically an accepted qualifying expense.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
What does the amount reconciliation show?
Compare received aid, matched spending and repayments made. The arithmetic difference is not a legally determined recoverable debt.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
What Swiss example applies separately?
Fribourg LSub37-38 distinguishes recovery grounds, warning-related circumstances and specified reliance or hardship branches. It is cantonal law, not federal SR616.1.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
How should evidence answer the authority's ground?
Connect purpose, period, expense and actual condition. Unrelated project documents do not substantiate the funded activity.
Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduCRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalFribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Service Public : Subventions versées aux associations
Which official references should you consult?
- Loi2000-321 art.10 : conditions/compte renduLégifrance
- CRPA art.L242-2 : condition-breaching subsidy withdrawalLégifrance
- Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.37Source officielle
- Fribourg/Freiburg LSub/SubG cantonal art.38Source officielle
- Service Public : Subventions versées aux associationsSource officielle
Texts cited last checked: 1 November 2026