Skip to main content
The rights map

French law · Prepare your case, step by step

Prepare a French over-indebtedness file

A French over-indebtedness file should consistently present income, expenses, assets and debts with supporting evidence. Distinguish confirmed, estimated and disputed amounts and explain how the situation developed. The narrative letter does not replace financial tables or documents. This organiser identifies missing information; it does not decide admissibility or suspend obligations simply because the worksheet has been completed.

Go to the organiser
A fact → a document → a check

Which situations should I distinguish?

Prepare a French over-indebtedness file · two situations to keep separate
SituationPurposeWhat to check
Financial inventoryPresent the financial positionCurrent supporting records
Explanatory letterDescribe developments and difficultiesConsistent chronology
Source 1Source 2

Do the narrative and inventory serve the same purpose?

Distinguish the complete inventory of income, expenses, assets and debts from the letter explaining the situation and how it developed.

Source 1Source 2

How should uncertain amounts be presented?

Match every declared amount to a recent supporting document and clearly flag estimated, disputed or variable amounts.

Source 1Source 2

Why distinguish categories of debt?

Separate personal, business and secured debts, and debts already in proceedings, to avoid a misleading presentation.

Source 1Source 2
Fictional example · adapt to your facts

What does a worked example show?

A person has drafted the narrative, but the debt list mixes current balances with figures from older letters.

The resulting sheet
Task
Prepare a French over-indebtedness file
Evidence to locate
Application form and chronological explanatory letter
Question to resolve
How should uncertain amounts be presented?

Date each amount and connect the table to supporting records before finalising the explanation.

02 / Prepare my file

Which issues should I examine in my file?

  1. Do the narrative and inventory serve the same purpose?

    Read this distinction: Distinguish the complete inventory of income, expenses, assets and debts from the letter explaining the situation and how it developed. Record what your documents establish and what remains uncertain.

  2. How should uncertain amounts be presented?

    Read this distinction: Match every declared amount to a recent supporting document and clearly flag estimated, disputed or variable amounts. Record what your documents establish and what remains uncertain.

  3. Why distinguish categories of debt?

    Read this distinction: Separate personal, business and secured debts, and debts already in proceedings, to avoid a misleading presentation. Record what your documents establish and what remains uncertain.

01 / Prepare my file

How can I prepare this file?

This organiser assembles your choices on this page. Fields are not sent automatically and are not retained after reloading.

Your starting documents
The point to check

Read this distinction: Distinguish the complete inventory of income, expenses, assets and debts from the letter explaining the situation and how it developed. Record what your documents establish and what remains uncertain.

03 / JULIE

What should I know before acting?

Do the narrative and inventory serve the same purpose?

Distinguish the complete inventory of income, expenses, assets and debts from the letter explaining the situation and how it developed.

Source 1Source 2

How should uncertain amounts be presented?

Match every declared amount to a recent supporting document and clearly flag estimated, disputed or variable amounts.

Source 1Source 2

Why distinguish categories of debt?

Separate personal, business and secured debts, and debts already in proceedings, to avoid a misleading presentation.

Source 1Source 2

Which documents make this file useful?

Start by locating these records: Application form and chronological explanatory letter; Evidence of identity, address, family circumstances, income and expenses; Bank statements, contracts, account statements and correspondence from every creditor. Keep unknown or unavailable details marked as such; a checklist is not proof that a document exists.

What does the worked example demonstrate?

A person has drafted the narrative, but the debt list mixes current balances with figures from older letters. Date each amount and connect the table to supporting records before finalising the explanation. This fictional example demonstrates a preparation method, not the outcome of a real case.

Which mistakes can change the analysis?

Avoid these shortcuts: Omitting a creditor, account, asset or disputed debt instead of identifying and explaining it; Submitting figures that are not matched to evidence, or illegible and unsorted documents.

Source 1Source 2

Does completing the sheet submit a request?

No. The sheet organises your selected issue, available records and own notes. It sends nothing to an authority or another party, calculates no deadline and cannot suspend one. Copy the file and check the applicable procedure before acting. Date each amount and connect the table to supporting records before finalising the explanation.

How can Julie help with this preparation?

Julie by AlphaDeep is an AI legal assistant for French law. Use the chosen question to discuss this task: Prepare a French over-indebtedness file. Julie can help explain sources, examine document wording and draft a response. Check its proposals against your originals and ask the appropriate professional to review consequential choices.

JULIE PRO

How can I continue with Julie?

Continue with Julie: sourced questions, document analysis and assisted drafting.

Become Pro
Sources consulted on 21 September 2026.

Which official sources should I check?

Which related task can I prepare next?

Request correction of a French FICP entryPrepare a right-to-account file in FranceRegularise an unpaid cheque in France

General information about French law. This organiser does not file or send an application. Have consequential choices checked by the relevant professional.